When the dust settles the amount of new income generated is multiple times the initial increase in spending—hence, the nam e the spending multiplier. The table below gives an example of how this could work with an increase in government spending. Note that the multiplier works the same way in reverse with a decrease in spending. Table 1 works through the process of the multiplier. Fortunately for everyone who is not carrying around a computer with a spreadsheet program to project the impact of an original increase in expenditures over 20, 50, or rounds of spending, there is a formula for calculating the multiplier.
The marginal propensity to consume MPC is the fraction of any change in income that is consumed and the marginal propensity to save MPS is the fraction of any change in income that is saved. In this case, the formula is:. Thus, an equivalent form for the multiplier is:. Watch the selected clip from this video stopping at for more practice in solving for the spending multiplier.
In the real world, the multiplier formula is more complex since economic agents have more options than just spending or saving.
They have to pay taxes, and they can buy imports, both of which reduce the amount of money being multiplied. If the leakages are relatively small, then each successive round of the multiplier effect will have larger amounts of demand, and the multiplier will be high.
Over the years, economists lost interest in the exact value of the multiplier, because monetary policy was seen as a macroeconomic stabilizer superior to fiscal policy.
The Great Recession broke this consensus, with many seeing the years that followed as an example of conditions under which monetary stimulus was doomed to fail. With renewed interest, academic literature returned to the question of the fiscal multiplier as offering a possible solution to sluggish economies. Those working in macroeconomics, as with any other field of applied economics, are constantly unnerved by the prospect of their statistical modeling techniques failing to measure what they claim they measure.
At the onset of the crisis, vector autoregression and the narrative approach were the two statistical methods that macroeconomists felt best addressed issues applied to the question of the multiplier.
Each method exhibits certain weaknesses, leaving plenty of room for debate. Following the crisis, these methodologies were applied to the question of the size of the fiscal multiplier. However, one significant issue with the methodology remains: it is not always clear what will occur outside the context of the statistical test.
Without theory, it is not known what the results of the statistical model actually imply for the real world.
For macroeconomics and the multiplier, this is especially important. When thinking about the practical effects of government spending as stimulus, it is necessary to consider the other means of mitigating recessions—monetary policy. Hypothetically, a central bank conducting monetary policy can choose to magnify or stifle the effects of government spending. For example, when Congress decides to conduct a stimulus program, the central bank could respond by subsequently printing more or less money as a result.
It does not make sense to analyze the expected effects of fiscal policy without a theory of how the monetary authority will interpret and react. Implicit in macroeconomics is an expectation of how central banks will behave, although this assumption is not always incorporated into the fiscal policy analysis. Most central banks have an edict to target inflation—either a specific rate of inflation or something akin to it.
This mandate presents a serious problem for government spending to function as claimed. If it is to work i. But if the central banks have tools to target inflation and are willing to use them, any and all attempts at fiscal stimulus will be offset by the monetary authority. In a recent paper in the Journal of Financial Economic Policy , I examine the application of the credibility revolution in statistical methods in light of the problem of monetary offset.
While most methods use national data, the new and clever research designs very frequently use subnational data, such as that of US states. These methods take advantage of differences in government spending across states that have desirable statistical properties, and they use these differences to derive multipliers from spending at the subnational level.
Stagflation is a combination of high inflation, high unemployment, and stagnant economic growth. Because inflation isn't supposed to occur in a weak economy, stagflation is an unnatural situation. Slow growth prevents inflation in a normal The laissez-faire economic theory centers on the restriction of government intervention in the economy.
According to laissez-faire economics, the economy is at its strongest when the government protects individuals' rights but otherwise doesn't intervene. What Is Adverse Selection? Adverse selection is a term that describes the presence of unequal information between buyers and sellers, distorting the market and creating conditions that can lead to an economic collapse.
Mauritania, Islamic Republic of. Saudi Arabia. Syrian Arab Republic. Tajikistan, Republic of. United Arab Emirates. Uzbekistan, Republic of. Yemen, Republic of. Western Hemisphere. American Samoa. Antigua and Barbuda. Bahamas, The. Costa Rica. Dominican Republic.
El Salvador. Puerto Rico. Kitts and Nevis. Vincent and the Grenadines. Trinidad and Tobago. United States. Series Archived Series. Balance of Payments Statistics. Direction of Trade Statistics. Economic Issues. Government Finance Statistics. IMF Special Issues. IMF Staff Papers. IMF Survey. International Financial Statistics. Occasional Papers. Pamphlet Series. Seminar Volumes. World Economic and Financial Surveys. Books and Analytical Papers. Departmental Papers.
IMF Working Papers. Miscellaneous Publications. Per Jacobsson lecture. Policy Papers. External Sector Report. Fiscal Monitor. Global Financial Stability Report. Regional Economic Outlook.
World Economic Outlook. Notes and Manuals. Analytical Notes. FinTech Notes. Gobal Financial Stability Notes. Spillover Notes. Staff Climate Notes. Staff Discussion Notes. Tax Law Technical Note. Technical Notes and Manuals. Official Reports and Documents. Annual Report of the Executive Board. Articles of Agreement.
IMF Speeches. Independent Evaluation Office Reports. Selected Decisions. Selected Legal and Institutional Papers Series. Summary Proceedings. IMF Research Bulletin.
IMF Research Perspectives. Advanced search Help. Browse Topics Business and Economics. Archived Series. Previous Article Next Article. What does it really mean? Author: Shu-Chin Yang. Download PDF Abstract Full Text Related Publications. Abstract In the discussion of economic questions, even in the nonspecialist press, many terms are used which until quite recently were employed only by economists or others professionally concerned. The Process The multiplier process is a chain reaction.
Public Finance Thus far the description is of a very simple economy, without taxation, for example. Balance of Payments New exports also have exactly the same multiplier effects as does new domestic investment. Change in Consumption Thus far we have assumed that a change in private consumption bears a fixed proportion to a change in the national income and that the initial economic change comes through either a change in private investment, in government expenditure, or in export.
Download Figure Download figure as PowerPoint slide. An Illustration There are three ways in which new income received may leak out of the system being subjected to the multiplier process. Table 2. Table 2 Private Income Expenditure on Domestic Consumption Goods Imports Taxes Savings 1st round 50 50 2nd round 60 30 30 3rd round 36 18 18 4th round Employment and Capacity The importance of the multiplier process in modern economic thinking derives from the characteristics of economic depression in industrialized countries, where there coexist large numbers of unemployed workers on the one hand and substantial excess productive capacity in transport equipment, machinery, factory buildings, etc.
Money Income Versus Real Output The effectiveness of the multiplier in increasing real output depends on the level of unemployment and the degree of utilization of capacity. The Elasticity of Supply While the lack of capital goods industries in developing countries makes it particularly difficult for them to create more productive capacity for industry, the problem of securing speedy increases in agricultural output may be even more serious and deep-rooted.
Same Series. What Does It Really Mean? Fiscal Policy What does it really mean? The Forward Exchange Market What does it really mean? Other IMF Content. Are Exchange Rates Excessively Volatile? What Determines Government Spending Multipliers? Chapter 8. Other Publishers. ADB Brief No.
0コメント